Justice Minister: Rule of law report published by EC is wrong in many ways
The justice minister said the report is based on an arbitrary scope and the commission does not follow any benchmark document in it.
Justice Minister Judit Varga said the first rule of law report published by the European Commission last week is wrong in many ways and cannot serve as a basis for further discussion on the rule of law.
In an opinion piece on the news website EUObserver, the minister said the report is based on an arbitrary scope and the commission does not follow any benchmark document in it. “The notion that there exists a generally accepted definition of rule of law that may serve as the basis of a comprehensive review remains the subject of serious debate,” she added.
Minister Varga said that media pluralism, as opposed to media freedom, was not a rule of law issue and the same applied to “transparent allocation of state advertising” or “public information campaigns” where no well-established European standards may be identified. At the same time, protection of the rights of ethnic and national minorities and the national frameworks addressing anti-Semitism are notably absent from the report, she said. “Corruption appears in the report, but the text remains silent on money-laundering where systemic institutional failures have been exposed recently in some member states,” she added.
The commission claims that it evaluates all member states based on uniform and objective criteria, but a “tendentious interpretation of the rule of law results in a focus on a few pre-determined member states, namely Hungary and Poland”, she added. Minister Varga said Hungary and Belgium were subjects of the same number of reports on the Strasbourg-based Council of Europe’s platform to promote the protection of journalism in the period of 2019-2020. “The commission’s interpretation? In Hungary there is a ‘systemic obstruction’ of independent media, while in Belgium, intimidation is ‘relatively rare’,” she added.
Minister Varga highlighted that since the commission did not have the resources or the expertise to maintain its own monitoring system, its report was based mostly on external sources. “Its reliability and objectivity, therefore, depend on the selection and quality of these sources, the selection of which, unfortunately, is non-transparent and biased,” she added.
During the course of this year, Hungary has provided the commission with detailed analyses to assist the preparation of the report but the commission has “essentially disregarded our contribution”, she said. The report “refers extensively and repeatedly to certain civil society organisations (CSO) – in the case of Hungary, 14 sources from 12 CSOs to be exact”, she said. Of these, 13 sources come from 11 CSOs that have recently received financial support from the Open Society Foundations, she added. “In fact, the report has been written by these CSOs, even the parts that seemingly come from other sources,” Minister Varga said.
Photo credit: Hírstart